Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Anatomy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3 Department of Anatomy, Baqiatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 4Department of Anatomy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
There is increasing public concern that environmental
toxicants have the potential to impair human
fertility due to adverse developmental and
reproductive effects being observed in laboratory
animals and wildlife after their exposure. Phthalate
esters have attracted considerable attention due to
their high production volume and use as plasticizers
in the plastics industry (
Fredricsson observed that DEHP affected human
sperm motility in a dose dependent manner (
Several
In this experimental study,male NMRI mice were maintained in 22 ± 2°C with a 12 hours light:dark cycle and with access to food and water ad libitum during the course of the study. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.
The mice (mean age: 4-6 weeks) were divided into
four groups with ten mice per group which were
treated daily by gavage for 2 weeks. Control mice
in group I were administered vehicle (100 μl corn
oil). Animals in group II were treated with 2g DEHP
(CAS NO: 117-81-7, Osaka, Japan)/100 μl corn oil/
kg. Group III received 1mg LC (Sigma-Aldrich
Chemie, Italy) GmbH/100 μl deionized water and
group IV were treated with a 1mg LC/μl deionized
water combination 2g DEHP/100μl corn oil per kg
body weight. Our previous study showed that corn
oil is ineffective in spermatogenesis (
The initial body weight on the first day and final body weight on the termination day (prior to cervical dislocation) of the experiment and testis weights of both sides were recorded for each animal. Testes were trimmed of fat prior to recording their weights. After weighing, the left testis was fixed in Bouinś fluid for histopathological examination, and the right testis was frozen at -20°C, until thawed for daily sperm production analysis.
Fixed testis was embedded in paraffin, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E). The histopathlogical specimens were examined under light microscopy. Twelve cross-sections of stage VII-VIII seminiferous tubules from each animal were analyzed by Motic software for tubular diameter (from basal lamina to the other side basal lamina), epithelial height (basal lamina to neck of elongated spermatids), and luminal diameter. In addition, with a ×100 magnification light microscope, the number of sertoli cells and round spermatids were counted for each animal in the 12 cross-sections of stage VII-VIII seminiferous tubules. Data were expressed as the mean of the sertoli cells and round spermatids. These stages were chosen as representative to include morphologically identifiable stages.
The right testis was thawed at room temperature,
decapsulated, and homogenized in 2 ml of 0.9 %
NaCl solution for 6 minutes using a tissue homogenizer
set at low speed. The homogenate was allowed
to settle for 1 minute and then gently mixed.
After thorough mixing of each sample, the number
of homogenization-resistant spermatid heads was
counted by a hemocytometer. The testicular spermatid
number per gram testis (TSN) was calculated
according to the respective formula. DSP
was calculated by dividing the TSN by 4.84 (the
duration of step 14-16 spermatids in the mouse
seminiferous epithelial cycle) (
The right cauda epididymis of each animal was minced, suspended in 1 ml of T6 medium that contained 4 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at 37°C and 5% CO2.
For the sperm count in the caudal epididymis, 5 μl of the sperm suspension was observed with an optical microscope using a haemocytometer with a cover glass of 0.1 mm thickness. The total number of sperm was counted and the mean was calculated from two counts.
For assessing the sperm motility, 5 μl of sample was placed on a clean microscope slide and covered with a coverslip. Immediately, with ×400 light microscope magnification, 100 sperms were analyzed per sample. Each spermatozoa was classified as: A .rapid linear progressive motility, B .slow or sluggish linear or non-linear motility, C .nonprogressive motility or D .immotile sperm. Percent motile sperm (A+B+C) and percent progressive sperm (A+B) were also calculated.
For studying the sperm morphology, a drop of sperm suspension was smeared onto a clean glass slide. The smear was then air dried and fixed in a mixture of equal parts ethanol and ether. The slides were then stained with Papanicolaou stain. Dried stained slides were scanned under oil immersion (100 objectives) for morphological abnormalities. A total of 100 sperms per sample were classified according to their morphology; such as normal, coiled mid piece, hair pin (a kink at the annulus, usually 180°), bent tail (a kink at the annulus, usually 90°), coiled tail, double head, amorphous head, triangular head, pin head and cytoplasmic droplet. Sperm abnormality was expressed as percent.
For sperm vitality, a drop of sample was put on a clean glass slide and mixed with one droplet of eosin B (0.5% in normal saline). A total of 100 sperm were assessed per animal. Each spermatozoa was classified as motile living sperm, immotile living sperm, or dead sperm.
For the sperm chromatin quality, a drop of sample was smeared, dried, and fixed. Then, slides were stained with 5% aniline blue. For each animal, 100 sperm were counted with 100x objective and classified as low-staining sperm, mid-staining sperm, or high-staining sperm.
Analyses were conducted with SPSS 15.0 for Windows software. Comparison between initial and final body weights was done by paired sample ttest. The viability, motility, progressiveness, and morphology of epididymal sperm and the chromatin quality in treated groups were analyzed by Kruskal- Wallis followed by Mann-Whitney U test. Body and testis weight, sperm count, TSN, DSP, seminiferous tubular and luminal diameter, seminiferous epithelium height, sertoli, and the round spermatid number between groups were compared statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparison. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
The mean body weight at the beginning of the experiment
was not significantly different among the
groups. The mean final body weight significantly decreased
in the experimental groups when compared
to group I (p<0.05). The mean final body weight increased
compared to the mean initial body weight in
the experimental groups but this difference was not
significant except for group I (
The right and left testes weight of the DEHPtreated group (group II) significantly decreased compared to group I (p<0.05). No remarkable alternations in the testes weights of group IV were observed compared to group I (control group). Table 1 summarizes body and testes weights.
Tubular diameter decreased in all experimental groups compared to the control group. The decrease was significant (p<0.05), except for group III. In addition, tubular diameter in group IV significantly increased compared to group II (p<0.05). The seminiferous epithelial height of groups II and IV decreased compared to the control. The decrease was significant (p<0.05) only in group II.
Body and testis weights
Variable | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | |
20.2 ± 1.6 | 19.8 ± 1.8 | 21.4 ± 0.5 | 21.2 ± 0.7 | |
27.1 ± 3.8 | 20.9 ± 2.2* | 23.2 ± 0.8* | 22.2 ± 1.8* | |
76 ± 18 | 51 ± 10* | 75 ± 7 | 60 ± 10 | |
75 ± 7 | 51 ± 11* | 75 ± 10 | 61 ± 12 | |
Data represent mean ± SD
* p < 0.05 compared with group I
Group I: Control group
Group II: DEHP group
Group III: L-carnitine group
Group IV: DEHP and L-carnitine group
Results of histopathological examination
Variable | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | |
159 ± 15.6 | 122.5 ± 14.4* | 158.7 ± 3.2 | 139.3 ± 15.2* # | |
63.1 ± 8 | 60.6 ± 10.2 | 59.1 ± 8.3 | 54 ± 8.8 | |
48.9 ± 4.6 | 30.7 ± 5.2* | 50 ± 3.7# | 42.7 ± 6.5# | |
23.3 ± 2.2 | 15.1 ± 1.3* | 22.4 ± 1.8 | 17.1 ± 2.4* | |
110.5 ± 8.9 | 51.8 ± 4.1* | 112.7 ± 8.8 | 73.3 ± 22.8* # | |
Data represent mean ± SD
* < 0.05 compared with group I
# p < 0.05 compared with group II
Group I: Control group
Group II: DEHP group
Group III: L-carnitine group
Group IV: DEHP and L-carnitine group
Results of sperm count, TSN, and DSP
Variable | Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | |
3.5 ± 1.26 | 1.5 ± 0.19* | 3.18 ± 0.47 | 2.6 ± 1# | |
83.6 ± 22.7 | 49.9 ± 22.8* | 82.8 ± 15.4 | 64.6 ± 15.7# | |
17.1 ± 4.7 | 10.3 ± 4.7* | 17 ± 3.8 | 13.4 ± 3# | |
Data represent mean ± SD
* p < 0.05 compared with group I
# p < 0.05 compared with group II
Group I: Control group
Group II: DEHP group
Group III: L-carnitine group
Group IV: DEHP and L-carnitine group
In group IV, epithelial height significantly increased
when compared to group II. No significant change
was detected in the luminal diameter among the
groups (
The number of sertoli cells and round spermatids
per each seminiferous tubule significantly decreased
in both groups II and IV compared to the
control group (p<0.05). These parameters in group
IV increased compared to group II, but only the
increase in the number of round spermatids was
significant (p<0.05) (
Table 3 shows that the number of homogenization- resistant spermatids and daily sperm production per gram testis were not significantly changed in groups III and IV compared to control values. Those of group II were significantly altered by DEHP exposure (p<0.05). TSN and DSP of group IV significantly increased compared to group II (p<0.05).
Results of the sperm count, percentage of motility, and progressiveness of all groups are summarized in tables 3 and 4. Sperm number, percentage of motility and progressiveness of group III were not significantly altered, and those of group II were significantly diminished when compared to the control group. In group IV, decrease in sperm count, motility (%), and progressiveness (%) were seen in comparison with the control; these alternations were significant (p<0.05) except for the parameter of sperm count. There was a significant increase in the sperm count of group IV as compared with that in the control group (p<0.05).
Data of sperm vitality and chromatin quality analyses are shown in Table 4. Regarding the sperm vitality, the percentage of motile living sperm of groups II and IV significantly reduced and percentage of dead sperm in groups II and IV were significantly increased compared to the control group (p<0.05). No remarkable alternations were observed in the other cases.
Regarding sperm chromatin quality, low-staining sperm (%) of group II was significantly diminished, and those of group III was significantly increased compared to the control group (p<0.05).
Results of sperm motility, progressive, vitality, and chromatin quality
Variable | Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | ||
80 (66-95) | 40 (11-60.5) * | 69.5 (50-94) | 41.5 (29-74) * | ||
47.75 (35-62) | 17.5 (5-35.5) * | 39.5 (15-64) | 19(12-46) * | ||
33.75 (7.5-63) | 9 (4-23) * | 34.25 (13-67) | 14.5 (10-22) * | ||
11 (4-19) | 8.5 (5-13) | 15.75 (1-37) | 11 (4-28) | ||
50.5 (33-80.5) | 81.5 (65-91) * | 43 (32-73) | 75 (65-81) * | ||
75.5 (62.5-86) | 40.5 (36-43) * | 90 (81-96) * | 78 (60-87) # | ||
25.5 (12-37) | 51 (36-59) * | 7.5 (4-15) * | 18.5 (12-37) # | ||
2 (0-5) | 8 (5-22) * | 2.5 (0-4) | 3 (0-5) # | ||
Data represent median (minimum-maximum)
* p < 0.05 compared with group I
# p < 0.05 compared with group II
Group I: Control group
Group II: DEHP group
Group III: L-carnitine group
Group IV: DEHP and L-carnitine group
In group IV, the percentage of low-staining sperm
was increased from group I and II, but this increase
was significant only in group II (p<0.05). A significant
decrease in percentage of mid-staining sperm
and high-staining sperm of group IV were seen
when compared to group II (p<0.05). No significant
changes were detected in these parameters of
group IV compared to the control group (
Morphological abnormality of cauda epididymal sperm (Papanicolaou staining, ×1000 magnification).
The normal sperm morphology (%) of group II was significantly reduced compared with the control group (p<0.05). There were no remarkable differences among the groups in the other cases.
In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of LC on DEHP-induced disruption of spermatogenesis. We found that administration of LC could have some beneficial effects on spermatogenesis in DEHP-treated mice. This shows that LC can protect the testes from the gonadotoxicity of DEHP. This is the first demonstration of the prevention of DEHP-induced spermatogenic injuries by LC.
DEHP was regarded as an endocrine disruptor.
Previous reports have demonstrated that
DEHP disturbed spermatogenesis (
Recently we reported that oral administration of
LC to mice with normal spermatogenesis did not
have a significant effect of their reproductive systems
(
In our experiment, the analyses showed that administration of LC during DEHP-treatment could generally recover testis weight, normal sperm morphology and sperm chromatin quality and partially protect seminiferous epithelium height, TSN, DSP, sperm count, and number of round spermatid. However body weight, sperm motility, and sperm vitality had not yet reached the control level in spite of LC, and there were still significant differences in comparison with the control group. Therefore, in future experiments, it may be essential that a higher dosage or longer duration of treatment of LC should be determined for complete recovery of DEHP-induced lesions.
The preventive effects of LC on DEHP-induced testicular damage have been demonstrated for the first time in the present study. Our findings show that LC plays an important role in the maintenance of spermatogenesis.