Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Reproduction and Development Department, Reproductive Biomedicine Center, Royan Institute for Animal Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan, Iran
2 Reproduction and Development Department, Reproductive Biomedicine Center, Royan Institute for Animal Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan, Iran;Animal Sciences Department, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, M
3 Reproduction and Development Department, Reproductive Biomedicine Center, Royan Institute for Animal Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan, Iran;Embryology Department, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACE
Abstract
Keywords
During the last decade, development of cell-free
sequential media for the culture of mammalian
preimplantation embryos has been an active, and
albeit successful, area of research with comparable
results with the co-culture system (
Although co-culture systems produce good developmental
results as measured by both the frequency
of blastocyst formation, particularly cryo-resistance
(
During a recent study, we optimized a vitrification
procedure with an embryo co-culture system that
enabled vitrified bovine embryos to re-expand and
hatch at rates similar to non-vitrified embryos (
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Royan Institute. Unless otherwise specified, chemicals and media were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Gibco (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) companies, respectively.
In vitro maturation and fertilization of abattoir-derived
bovine oocytes were carried out as described
elsewhere (
The vitrification protocol used in this study was a
modified technique of Martínez et al. (
The viability of hatched blastocysts developed in
vitrified and non-vitrified groups was determined
by the differential staining method of Hosseini et al.
(
All experiments in this study were repeated at least three times. To compare rates of blastocyst development and hatching between treatments, chi square analysis was applied. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for vitrification groups and the t test was used for comparisons of means. When the ANOVA test showed statistical differences, the Student- Neumann-Keuls test was used to discriminate between groups. All statistical evaluations were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 11. All data were presented as means ± SEM and differences were significant at p<0.05.
From 420 bovine ovaries obtained from an abattoir, 2540 COCs were cultured for in vitro maturation (IVM), 2230 were subjected to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and 1840 presumptive zygotes were subsequently cultured in sequential SOF (n=900) and vero B2 co-culture systems (n=1250) for 8 days when the ratios of cleavage, morula, and days 6-8 blastocyst formation were determined. Table 1 compares detailed results of developmental competence in addition to the quality of the resultant blastocysts developed under both culture systems. As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in cleavage rate of embryos cultured in the co-culture (92.0%) versus SOF (86.5%) groups (p<0.05). However, zygotic development in the co-culture conditions resulted in significantly greater development to the 8-16 (87.0%) and morula (75.0%) stages compared to SOF culture media (47.3% and 54.4%, respectively; p<0.05). On the other hand, while 37.1% of morula stage embryos in SOF medium developed to blastocysts at day 6 of in vitro production (IVP), none of the embryos (0.0%) in the co-culture system developed into blastocysts at the same day. Similarly, the blastocyst yield rate at days 7 and 8 were significantly higher when embryo development occurred in SOF versus the coculture system (49.3% and 51.2% vs. 28.3% and 40.1%, respectively; p<0.05; Table 1).
Hatching ability of the blastocysts in both groups were non-significantly different (p<0.05). Comparing the quality of hatched blastocysts developed in the two culture systems, although the culture upon monolayer significantly increased total cell number (TCN) of the blastocysts that developed compared to SOF (248.0 vs. 221.0), the inner cell mass / trophectoderm (ICM/TE) ratio of the SOF-cultured embryos (41.5%) was significantly higher than the related rate of co-cultured embryos (33.1%). However, there was no significant difference in the viability and DNA fragmentation index (DFI) of the blastocysts developed in both groups.
After vitrification/warming of co-culture versus SOF developed blastocysts, there was no significant difference in the proportion of immediate degenerated blastocysts (15.7% vs. 16.7%) nor the proportion of embryos re-expanded when assessed 12 hours post warming (84.3% vs. 83.3%; p<0.05). However, the hatching rate of vitrified/ warmed blastocysts developed in SOF medium (65.0%) was significantly lower than the rate of the co-culture condition (74.3%). Consequently, the post-warming total degeneration rate of the coculture group (25.7%) was significantly lower than the SOF (35.0%) group.
After vitrification-warming, blastocysts developed in SOF medium had signifcantly lower quality in terms of TCN and ICM/TE ratio than those developed in the co-culture system. Although analysis of viability indicated no significant difference between the hatched blastocysts of the two groups, DFI value of the co-culture group (10.0%) was significantly lower than the SOF group (13.5%).
Effect of culture system on developmental yield and quality of in vitro produced bovine embryos
Numbers (%)1 of embryos developed to: | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blastocyst | Blastocyst quality | |||||||||||
1250 | 1150(92.0 ± 3.1) | 1000 (87.0 ± 2.3)* | 862(75.0 ± 3.1)* | 0(0.0 ± 0.0)* | 325(28.3 ± 2.2)* | 461 (40.1±1.1)* | 384 (83.3 ± 3.6) | 248.0 ± 4.5 | 33.1 ± 1.1* | 96.3 ± 0.3 | 6.1 ± 0.0 | |
885 | 765(86.5 ± 4.3) | 362 (47.3 ± 2.0)* | 416 (54.4 ± 4.1)* | 284 (37.1 ± 3.9)* | 377 (49.3 ± 3.2)* | 391 (51.2±3.2)* | 316(80.8 ± 3.1) | 221.0 ± 4.5 | 41.5 ± 2.5* | 94.7 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | |
1. Cleavage rates expressed based on the number of presumptive zygotes; the percentages of embryos that further progressed to blastocysts were expressed based on the number of embryos cleaved and the percentages of hatching were expressed based on the total number of blastocysts.
2. Percentage of live cells/TCN.
3. DFI: DNA fragmentation index, expressed as the percentage of TUNEL-positive/TCN cell nuclei.
*indicates significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05).
All percentages expressed as mean ± SEM.
Effect of culture system on cryosurvival and post-warming quality of vitrified bovine blastocysts produced in vitro
Blastocysts quality | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVP Culturesystem | Vitrified embryos(n) | Immediate degeneration (%) | Post-warming re-expansion after12 hours (%) | Total hatched | Totaldegeneration | TCN(n) | ICM/TE(%) | Viability1 (%) | DFI2(%) | |
96 | 15(15.7 ± 1.5) | 81(84.3 ± 1.6) | 60 (74.3 ± 2.0)* | 40 (25.7 ± 3.0)* | 215.4 ± 4.5* | 36.0 ± 2.2* | 95.2 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 1.0* | ||
122 | 21 (16.7 ± 1.0) | 101 (83.3 ± 1.0) | 65 (65.0 ± 2.4)* | 36 (35.0 ± 2.5)* | 170.4 ± 4.2* | 44.6 ± 2.3* | 93.4 ± 0.0 | 13.5 ± 1.5 * | ||
1. Percent of live cells/TCN.
2. DFI: DNA fragmentation index, expressed as the percentage of TUNEL-positive/TCN cell nuclei.
*Indicates significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05).
All percentages expressed as mean ± SEM.
Comparison between different cryosurvival parameters of vitrified vs. non-vitrified embryos cultured under different culture conditions
Comparisons | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVP culture system | Hatching (%) | TCN (n) | ICM/TE (%) | Viability (%) | DFI (%)ICM/TE (%) | ||||||||||
74.3 ± 2.0vs. | 83.3 ± 3.6* | 9.0 ± 1.6a | 215.4 ± 4.5vs. | 248.0 ± 4.5* | 77.6 ± 0.3a | 36.0 ± 2.2vs. | 33.1 ± 1.1* | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 95.2 ± 1.0vs. | 96.3 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 1.0vs. | 6.1 ± 0.0* | 3.9 ± 1.0a | |
65.0 ± 2.4vs. | 80.8 ± 3.1* | 15.8 ± 0.7b | 170.4 ± 4.2vs. | 21.0 ± 4.5* | 32.6 ± 0.0b | 44.6 ± 2.3vs. | 41.5 ± 2.5* | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 93.4 ± 0.0vs. | 94.7 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 115 ± 1.5vs. | 5.50 ± 0.7* | 6.0 ± 0.8b | |
# Level of difference between the two values compared.
*Indicates significant difference between non-vitrified vs. vitrified values of a given comparison (p<0.05)
In each row, comparisons with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
All percentages expressed as mean ± SEM.
In table 3 the results of quality assessment of nonvitrified
(
The levels of difference (LD) between the values of each comparison were also compared (based on statistical analysis of the replicate data). As shown, irrespective of the culture conditions employed, overall quality of vitrified-warmed IVP embryos (as measured by the rates of hatching, TCN and DFI) were significantly lower than the corresponding rates of non-vitrified embryos. Moreover, by looking into the LD between vitrified/non-vitrified embryos cultured in the same condition (Table 3), the culture of embryos in SOF versus the co-culture system resulted in different LD values which approached significance for hatching, TCN and DFI percentages (15.8%, 32.6% and 6.0% vs. 9.0%, 77.6% and 3.9%, respectively).
Fifty years after the first report of mammalian IVP
embryo (
The results of this study indicated somewhat new
concepts regarding the interplay between an in vitro
culture system, embryo development and cryoresistance
of bovine embryos that differ in some points
with some other studies. Taken together, obtained
results indicated that despite early initial lag in development,
in vitro culture of bovine presumptive
zygotes in SOF versus the co-culture system significantly
(p<0.05) promoted overall developmental
competence of bovine IVP embryos as measured by
the kinetics and percentages of blastocyst production
on days 6, 7 and 8 of culture (
The viability of vitrified-warmed embryos can be
assessed by a number of indices; the most common
is in vitro survival after a period of culture (
Although the cumulative results of current and old
studies agree with the positive effects of monolayer
cells for embryo cryopreservation (
Comparison between the results of viability and
apoptosis of vitrified/warmed embryos (
Therefore, it can be concluded that despite numerous
advantages which exist for cell-free over cell-based
culture media, a long-term plan should be undertaken
to develop a cell free sequential media containing
all the reported benefits of co-culture systems. This
may be achieved by analyzing the wide range of nutrients
and trophic factors released by the feeder cells
in the culture milieu (