Evaluation of Early Frozen Blastocyst Transfer in A True Natural Cycle Protocol in Comparison to A Hormone Replacement Protocol: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Ottawa, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ottawa, ON, Canada

2 Ottawa Fertility Centre, 100-955 Green Valley Crescent, Ottawa, ON, Canada

3 Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background: Timing of frozen embryo transfer (FET) within a purported window of implantation is of increasing interest,
and there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the transfer of frozen embryos early within these frozen embryo transfer
protocols. This study aimed to evaluate whether live birth rates were equivalent after FET of blastocysts 4 days after
luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in a true natural cycle protocol, compared to a hormone replacement (HR) protocol.
Materials and Methods: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study involving patients undergoing autologous frozen
blastocyst transfer from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2016. Cycles were grouped according to their protocol:
true natural cycle (hormonal detection of LH surge with FET scheduled four days later) versus HR cycle (luteal
phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression, oral or vaginal estradiol and intramuscular progesterone
starting five days before FET). A total of 850 cycles were included, 501 true natural cycles and 349 HR cycles. The
primary outcome was the live birth rate, secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage. Logbinomial
regression models were performed adjusting for a priori selected variables.
Results: Adjusted resulted in live birth rates of 38.7 and 40.4%, [adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 0.96, 95% confidence interval
(CI): 0.76-1.22, P=0.729] in the natural cycle and HR groups, respectively. The secondary outcome analyses did
not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in the rate of positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG),
clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate.
Conclusion: The timing of the FET four days after LH surge in a true natural cycle protocol results in equivalent live
birth rates compared to a HR protocol. Results of this study suggest that the window of implantation within the natural
cycle may be less finite than currently believed and further prospective studies evaluating the timing of frozen embryo
transfer are warranted.

Keywords

References

  1. Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20(6): 808-821.
  2. Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, et al. Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2): 126-136.
  3. Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 393(10178): 1310-1318.
  4. Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25(1): 2-14.
  5. Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review andmeta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(5): 458-470.
  6. Casper RF, Yanushpolsky EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(4): 867-872.
  7. Escriba MJ, Bellver J, Bosch E, Sanchez M, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Delaying the initiation of progesterone supplementation until the day of fertilization does not compromise cycle outcome in patients receiving donated oocytes: a randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(1): 92-97.
  8. Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Fiszbajn G, Sueldo C, Hart RJ, Ciapponi A. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (1): CD006359.
  9. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(23): 1796-1799.
  10. Imbar T, Hurwitz A. Synchronization between endometrial and embryonic age is not absolutely crucial for implantation. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(2): 472-474.
  11. Theodorou E, Forman R. Live birth after blastocyst transfer following only 2 days of progesterone administration in an agonadal oocyte recipient. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 25(4): 355-357.
  12. Bacal V, Fell DB, Shapiro H, Lanes A, Sprague AE, Johnson M, et al. The Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus database: a validation study. Hum Reprod Open. 2020; 2020(2): hoaa005.
  13. Cryopreservation. Vitrolife. Available from: https://www.vitrolife. com/products/cryopreservation/ (24 Feb 2022).
  14. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(6): 1155-1158.
  15. Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, Racca A, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, et al. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(11): 2234-2242.
  16. Alur-Gupta S, Hopeman M, Berger DS, Gracia C, Barnhart KT, Coutifaris C, et al. Impact of method of endometrial preparation for frozen blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4): 680-686.
  17. Cerrillo M, Herrero L, Guillen A, Mayoral M, Garcia-Velasco JA. Impact of endometrial preparation protocols for frozen embryo transfer on live birth rates. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017; 8(2): e0020.
  18. Mounce G, McVeigh E, Turner K, Child TJ. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(4): 915-920. e1.
  19. van de Vijver A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, Mackens S, Stoop D, Camus M, et al. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016; 31(5): 1097-1104.
  20. Kang HJ. Programmed versus natural frozen embryo transfer: which is the best nest? Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4): 636-637.
  21. Ishihara O, Araki R, Kuwahara A, Itakura A, Saito H, Adamson GD. Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 singleembryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(1): 128-133.
  22. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(2): 368-377. e1-9.
  23. Sathanandan M, Macnamee MC, Rainsbury P, Wick K, Brinsden P, Edwards RG. Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and natural cycles: a prospective semi-randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1991; 6(5): 685-687.
  24. Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker VL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2): 252-257.
  25. Ginstrom Ernstad E, Wennerholm UB, Khatibi A, Petzold M, Bergh C. Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: increased risks in programmed cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221(2): 126. e1-126. e18.
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Volume 17, Issue 3
July 2023
Pages 195-200

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics