Hysteroscopy as An Investigational Operative Procedure in Primary and Secondary Infertility: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Systematic Review

Authors

Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Viale Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, Catania, Italy

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to review current indications to diagnostic and/or operative hysteroscopy in primary and secondary infertility, as well as to determine its efficacy in improving fertility.

Materials and Methods: We gathered available evidence about the role of hysteroscopy in the management of various infertility conditions. Literature from 2000 to 2020 that pertained to this topic were retrieved and appropriately selected.

Results: Hysteroscopy does not appear as a first line diagnostic procedure for every clinical scenario. However, its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in assessing intrauterine pathology is superior to all other non-invasive techniques, such as saline infusion/gel instillation sonography (SIS/GIS), transvaginal sonography (TVS) and hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysteroscopy allows not only a satisfactory evaluation of the uterine cavity but also, the eventual treatment of endocavitary pathologies that may affect fertility both in spontaneous and assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.

Conclusion: Hysteroscopy, due to its diagnostic and therapeutic potential, should be regarded as a necessary step in infertility management. However, in case of suspected uterine malformation, hysteroscopy should be integrated with other tests [three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] for diagnostic confirmation.

Keywords

References

1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitor­ing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009*. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(5): 1520-1524.
2. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Carlo C, Minozzi S, Spinelli M, Pistotti V, Alviggi C, et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproduc­tive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22(4): 479-496.
3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Pre­ferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7): e1000097.
4. Di Muzio M, Gambaro AML, Colagiovanni V, Valentini L, Di Simone E, Monti M. The role of hysteroscopy in unexplained infertility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 43(6): 862-865.
5. Elbareg AM, Essadi FM, Anwar KI, Elmehashi MO. Value of hys­teroscopy in management of unexplained infertility. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2014; 3(4): 295-298.
6. Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(6): 1632- 1635.
7. Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006; 22(2): 106-109.
8. Mazzon I, Corrado G, Masciullo V, Morricone D, Ferrandina G, Scambia G. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endo­metrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93(4): 1286-1289.
9. Chen L, Zhang H, Wang Q, Xie F, Gao S, Song Y, et al. Repro­ductive outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: experience from the largest women's hospital in China. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24(2): 299-304.
10. Mollo A, De Franciscis P, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Ven­ezia R, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(6): 2628-2631.
11. Tonguc EA, Var T, Yilmaz N, Batioglu S. Intrauterine device or es­trogen treatment after hysteroscopic uterine septum resection. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 109(3): 226-229.
12. Pacheco LA, Laganà AS, Garzon S, Garrido AP, Gornés AF, Ghez­zi F. Hysteroscopic outpatient metroplasty for T-shaped uterus in women with reproductive failure: results from a large prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 243: 173- 178.
13. Ban-Frangež H, Tomaževič T, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Ribič-Pucelj M, Bokal EV. The outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF/ICSI in women before and after hysteroscopic resection of a uterine septum compared to normal controls. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re­prod Biol. 2009; 146(2): 184-187.
14. Bakas P, Gregoriou O, Hassiakos D, Liapis A, Creatsas M, Ko­nidaris S. Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum and reproduc­tive outcome in women with unexplained infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012; 73(4): 321-325.
15. Raju GR, Kumari GS, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Assess­ment of uterine cavity by hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction programme and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274(3): 160-164.
16. Elsetohy KA, Askalany AH, Hassan M, Dawood Z. Routine office hysteroscopy prior to ICSI vs. ICSI alone in patients with normal transvaginal ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gy­necol Obstet. 2015; 291(1): 193-199.
17. Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJ, Koks CA, Van Golde R, Nap AW, et al. Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10038): 2622-2629.
18. Aghahosseini M, Ebrahimi N, Mahdavi A, Aleyasin A, Safdarian L, Sina S. Hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technique in women with recurrent implantation failure improves pregnancy like­lihood. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(3): S4.
19. El-Toukhy T, Campo R, Khalaf Y, Tabanelli C, Gianaroli L, Gordts SS, et al. Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a mul­ticentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10038): 2614- 2621.
20. Shawki HE, Elmorsy M, Eissa MK. Routine office hysteroscopy prior to ICSI and its impact on assisted reproduction program out­come: a randomized controlled trial. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012; 17(1): 14-21
21. Demirol A, Gurgan T. Effect of treatment of intrauterine pathologies with office hysteroscopy in patients with recurrent IVF failure. Re­prod Biomed Online. 2004; 8(5): 590-594.
22. El-Nashar IH, Nasr A. The role of hysteroscopy before intracyto­plasmic sperm injection (ICSI): a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(3): S266.
23. Shohayeb A, El-Khayat W. Does a single endometrial biopsy regi­men (S-EBR) improve ICSI outcome in patients with repeated im­plantation failure? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gy­necol Reprod Biol. 2012; 164(2): 176-179.
24. Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, Di Cesare C, Van Kerrebroeck H, De Angelis MC, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018; 10(3): 115-122.
25. Donaghay M, Lessey BA. Uterine receptivity: alterations associ­ated with benign gynecological disease. Semin Reprod Med. 2007; 25(6): 461-475.
26. Shokeir TA, Shalan HM, El-Shafei MM. Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile wom­en. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004; 30(2): 84-89.
27. Bosteels J, Wessel Sv, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, D'Hooghe TM, Bongers MY, et al. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Data­base Syst Rev. 2018; 12(12): CD009461.
28. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(1): 1-16.
29. Mazzon I, Corrado G, Masciullo V, Morricone D, Ferrandina G, Scambia G. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endometrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93(4): 1286-1289.
30. Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “Isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15(2): 172-175.
31. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Guardo F, Santangelo F, Cianci S, Giampaolino P. Commentary on “Assessment of risk factors of intrauterine adhesions in patients with induced abortion and the curative effect of hysteroscopic surgery”. J Invest Surg. 2019; 32(1): 90-92.
32. Hanstede MMF, van der Meij E, Goedemans L, Emanuel MH. Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003-2013. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(6): 1561-1568. e1.
33. Goldenberg M, Sivan E, Sharabi Z, Mashiach S, Lipitz S, Seidman DS. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic management of intrauterine septum and adhesions. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(10): 2663-2665.
34. Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Di Venere R, Pansini MV, Pellegrino A, Marello F, et al. Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr. bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(9): 2435-2438.
35. Bakour SH, Jones SE, O’Donovan P. Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20(6): 953-975.
36. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6): 1506-1512.
37. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(6): 761-771.
38. Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(1): 2-7.
39. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Catena U, Scutiero G, et al. Is hysteroscopy better than ultrasonography for uterine cavity evaluation? An evidence-based and patient-oriented approach. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2016; 8(3): 87-93.
40. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(2): 161-174.
41. Kowalik CR, Goddijn M, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, de Kruif JH, et al. Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (6): CD008576.
42. Zargar M, Ghafourian M, Nikbakht R, Mir Hosseini V, Moradi Choghakabodi P. Evaluating chronic endometritis in women with recurrent implantation failure and recurrent pregnancy loss by hysteroscopy and immunohistochemistry. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(1): 116-121.
43. Bakas P, Hassiakos D, Grigoriadis C, Vlahos N, Liapis A, Gregoriou O. Role of hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproduction techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21(2): 233-237.
44. Monteiro CS, Cavallo IK, Dias JA, Pereira FAN, Reis FM. Uterine alterations in women undergoing routine hysteroscopy before in vitro fertilization: high prevalence of unsuspected lesions. J Bras Reprod Assist. 2019; 23(4): 396-401.
45. Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(8): 1959-1965.
46. Takahashi K, Mukaida T, Tomiyama T, Oka C. High Pregnancy rate after hysteroscopy with irrigation in uterine cavity prior to blastocyst transfer in patients who have failed to conceive after blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 74(3 suppl 1): S206.
47. Almog B, Shalom-Paz E, Dufort D, Tulandi T. Promoting implantation by local injury to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(6): 2026-2029.
48. Chen HF, Chen SU, Ma GC, Hsieh ST, Tsai H Der, Yang YS, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening: current status and future challenges. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018; 117(2): 94-100.
49. Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, et al. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (3): CD009517.
50. Di Guardo F, Corte L Della, Vilos GA, Carugno J, Török P, Giampaolino P, et al. Evaluation and treatment of infertile women with Asherman syndrome: an updated review focusing on the role of hysteroscopy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(1): 55-61.
51. Genovese F, D’Urso G, Di Guardo F, Insalaco G, Tuscano A, Ciotta L, et al. Failed diagnostic hysteroscopy: analysis of 62 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 245: 193-197.
52. Di Guardo F, Palumbo M. Asherman syndrome and insufficient endometrial thickness: a hypothesis of integrated approach to restore the endometrium. Med Hypotheses. 2019; 134: 109521.
 
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Volume 15, Issue 2
April 2021
Pages 80-87

Files

Cited by

Share

How to cite

Statistics